Help promote human rights in the Middle East and North Africa

Donate Today
Facebook-f Icon-twitter-x Instagram Linkedin Youtube Envelope
Search
Close this search box.
  • English
  • العربية
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • What We Do
    • Who We Are
    • FAQs
    • Support Dawn
    • Work With Us
    • For the Media
  • Founder Jamal Khashoggi
    • Who Was Jamal Khashoggi?
    • Chronology of a Murder
    • UN Recommendations
    • International Reaction
    • In His Own Words
    • DAWN and Jamal
  • Countries
    • USA
    • Saudi Arabia
    • Egypt
    • UAE
    • Israel-Palestine
    • Jordan
    • DAWN's Culprits Gallery
  • Democracy In Exile
    • About
    • Submission Guidelines for Democracy in Exile
  • Advocacy
    • The Lobbyist Hall of Shame
    • DAWN's Culprits Gallery
    • Reforming Foreign Policy
      • Aid Conditionality
      • Human Rights Go to War
      • China's Uyghur Repression
      • Yemen: Toward Sustainable Peace and Democracy
      • Bridging Restraint and Positive Engagement
    • US Foreign Policy in MENA
    • Joint Advocacy
    • DAWN Foreign Policy Blueprint
  • Experts
  • Latest
Menu
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • What We Do
    • Who We Are
    • FAQs
    • Support Dawn
    • Work With Us
    • For the Media
  • Founder Jamal Khashoggi
    • Who Was Jamal Khashoggi?
    • Chronology of a Murder
    • UN Recommendations
    • International Reaction
    • In His Own Words
    • DAWN and Jamal
  • Countries
    • USA
    • Saudi Arabia
    • Egypt
    • UAE
    • Israel-Palestine
    • Jordan
    • DAWN's Culprits Gallery
  • Democracy In Exile
    • About
    • Submission Guidelines for Democracy in Exile
  • Advocacy
    • The Lobbyist Hall of Shame
    • DAWN's Culprits Gallery
    • Reforming Foreign Policy
      • Aid Conditionality
      • Human Rights Go to War
      • China's Uyghur Repression
      • Yemen: Toward Sustainable Peace and Democracy
      • Bridging Restraint and Positive Engagement
    • US Foreign Policy in MENA
    • Joint Advocacy
    • DAWN Foreign Policy Blueprint
  • Experts
  • Latest
Donate

Bahrain's Sham Elections and the Veneer of Democracy

November 22, 2022
in Democracy In Exile
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Author

  • Sayed Ahmed Alwadaei
    Sayed Ahmed Alwadaei

    Sayed Ahmed Alwadaei is the director of advocacy at the London-based Bahrain Institute for Rights and Democracy (BIRD). He has written for The New York Times and The Washington Post.

    View all posts

Bahrain's parliamentary elections this month should have been an opportunity for its citizens to exercise their political will and have their say in the future direction of the Gulf country. Instead, they took place in a context of fear and intimidation, without any credible political opposition or independent media. The major opposition parties, al-Wefaq and Wa'ad, were both dissolved by the government in recent years, and their former members prohibited from standing as electoral candidates. The only independent newspaper in Bahrain, al-Wasat, was forcibly shuttered in 2017. Adding to the heightened repression, the authorities made it a criminal offense to boycott the tightly controlled ballot.

Under these circumstances, the Nov. 12 elections provided nothing more than a veneer of democracy. Yet in an op-ed ahead of the first round of voting, Adam Ereli, the former U.S. ambassador to Bahrain, painted a rosy picture of Bahrain's sham elections, arguing that "while admittedly imperfect, Bahrain's stewardship of the democratic process nevertheless provides a much needed and publicly validated opportunity for its citizens to participate in the governing of their country." Ereli did not offer any evidence for his claim that the elections are "publicly validated." But he did parrot the Bahraini government's justifications for outlawing opposition political parties, sounding like a lobbyist for the Bahraini government. "When those organizations are in thrall to foreign powers"—a hardly coded reference to Iran—"and seek to alter the system of government, corrective action may be necessary," he wrote. 

Ereli chose not to mention his ties to other Gulf governments: He has been a paid lobbyist for Qatar, and was on the advisory board for a pro-Saudi think tank, the Arabia Foundation, that abruptly closed last year. Nor did The Hill include in his byline his current position as the CEO of a strategic advisory firm that he founded in 2016, the IberoAmerican Group, which describes itself as advising unspecified foreign governments in the Middle East.

Ereli's government-friendly portrait of Bahrain couldn't be further from the truth. I am a Bahraini national, who was imprisoned and tortured at the hands of the regime for standing up for democracy in the popular protests of 2011. I have been stripped of my Bahraini citizenship and rendered stateless simply because I dared to expose Bahrain's human rights violations.

Rather than offering an opportunity for change in the country, this vote was the most restricted since the return of parliamentary elections in Bahrain in 2002.

- Sayed Ahmed Alwadaei

Elections, as Ereli's article suggested, are understood to be the exercise of a legislative power that represents the will of the people. However, a new report on Bahrain's elections by my organization, the London-based Bahrain Institute for Rights and Democracy, found that rather than offering an opportunity for change in the country, this vote was the most restricted since the return of parliamentary elections in Bahrain in 2002.

Our study found that repression in the lead-up to November's elections explicitly targeted political dissidents. The application of Bahrain's so-called Political Isolation Law, combined with Legislative Decree No. 57 of 2014, which allow the government to remove the names of individuals who have chosen not to vote in previous elections from the electoral roll, resulted in the exclusion of 80,000 individuals from potentially running in these elections. Between 94,000 and 105,000 individuals were also deliberately denied their right to vote, without appeal. After the first round of the election, Bahrain imposed more bogus charges against one of the country's most prominent human rights defenders, Abdulhadi al-Khawaja, who is serving a life sentence in prison after the government rounded up the leaders of the 2011 protests, which it crushed with the help of Saudi Arabia and other Gulf neighbors.

What we have in Bahrain is not a "democratic experiment," as Ereli claims, but a regime that cannot be changed by people casting their vote. Even in the absence of major restrictions surrounding the voting process itself, those elected would remain powerless in Bahrain's political system. The elected lower house of parliament, the Council of Representatives, shares almost equal power with an unelected upper chamber, the Consultative Council, which is personally appointed by the king. Even if both chambers agree on something, the king is still able to veto their decision. This can technically be overturned by a two-third majority vote by both chambers, but in a context where one is hand-picked by King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa, this is almost an impossibility. The king also regularly appoints his relatives as ambassadors, such as those to Bahrain's two key Western partners, the United States and the United Kingdom.

King Hamad runs Bahrain as if it were his own private family business.

Both the Bahraini government and its foreign boosters are using these elections to present Bahrain as being on the path to democratic progress. But the reality is that Bahrain is ruled through fear and repression by a ruthless monarchy.

- Sayed Ahmed Alwadaei

The lack of opportunity to make meaningful change in these elections was reflected in the turnout. While the government claimed a record turnout figure of 73 percent, this figure, even if taken at face value, fails to take into account Bahrainis who were eliminated from the electoral roll, resulting in an actual voter turnout that will not exceed 57 percent.

Both the Bahraini government and its foreign boosters are using these elections to present Bahrain as being on the path to democratic progress. But the reality is that Bahrain's society is ruled through fear and repression by a ruthless monarchy whose so-called parliament makes a mockery of democratic values.

This is what Ereli didn't tell readers amid his praise for Bahrain's elections. They were never going to be free, fair or democratic when opposition parties are banned, opposition leaders are imprisoned, tens of thousands of Bahraini citizens are excluded from voting, and hundreds of political prisoners remain behind bars—all under a government that deprives individuals of their basic rights to dissent or even call for an election boycott. What Ereli called "seeing the forest through the trees" was just excusing and even justifying all those abuses.

The countless Bahraini citizens who have sacrificed so much since 2011 for the collective dream of seeing democracy in their country—many paying with their lives or their basic rights and freedom—know the true cost of a democratic Bahrain, and the reality there today.

A polling station in Manama during Bahrain's parliamentary elections, Nov. 12, 2022. (Photo by Ayman Yaqoob/Anadolu Agency)

Source: Getty IMages

Tags: BahrainGulf region
Previous Post

Jordan: Government Should Comply with Court Decision to Reopen Teachers' Syndicate

Next Post

President of the Assembly of States Parties Should Take Action Against Israel's Wrongful Designations, 198 Groups Say

Related Posts

Democracy In Exile

Biden Should Heed the State Department's Dissent Over Gaza

What Syria and Gaza have in common is armed conflict whose destruction has fallen disproportionately on civilians.

Frederic C. Hof
November 30, 2023
Bridging Restraint

How a Foreign Policy of 'Restraint-Plus' Can Advance Human Rights

Debates over what restraint means for broader values-based commitments in U.S. foreign policy often hinge on one question: If...

Aslı Bâli
November 28, 2023
Democracy In Exile

The Gendered Nature of Authoritarianism

When authoritarian regimes are confronted with public protest and social unrest, they often respond by violently attacking women.

Dalia Fahmy
November 22, 2023
Democracy In Exile

After This War, Peacemaking Between Israelis and Palestinians Must Move Beyond Oslo

The international community would be wise to shed its two-state blinders and start considering alternatives to the Oslo-era process.

Michael Omer-Man
November 17, 2023
Next Post
Silvia Fernandez De Gurmendi (R) of Argentina takes the oath during a swearing-in ceremony as a new judge of the International Criminal Court (ICC), in The Hague,  on January 20, 2010.  Kuniko Ozaki of Japan and Silvia Fernandez de Gurmendi of Argentina are officially sworn in as ICC Judges after they were elected on  November 18, 2009 by the Assembly of States Parties for nine-year terms. ANP AFP PHOTO BAS CZERWINSKI netherlands out - belgium out (Photo credit should read BAS CZERWINSKI/AFP via Getty Images)

President of the Assembly of States Parties Should Take Action Against Israel’s Wrongful Designations, 198 Groups Say

Biden Should Heed the State Department's Dissent Over Gaza

November 30, 2023

How a Foreign Policy of 'Restraint-Plus' Can Advance Human Rights

November 28, 2023
GAZA CITY, GAZA - NOVEMBER 19: Palestinians in central and northern parts of the Gaza migrate to the southern parts of Gaza, passing through Israeli soldiers and tanks as the Israeli attacks continue in Gaza City, Gaza on November 19, 2023. (Photo by Mustafa Hassona/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Qatar, Egypt, and USA Urged to Halt Forced Displacement and Prevent Mass Deportation from Gaza

November 28, 2023

Categories

  • Advocacy
  • Aid Conditionality
  • Anonymous Interviews
  • Anonymous Interviews Egypt
  • Anonymous Interviews Saudi Arabia
  • Anonymous Interviews UAE
  • Bridging Restraint
  • Cases
  • Cases Egypt
  • Cases Saudi Arabia
  • Cases UAE
  • China's Uyghur Repression
  • Countries
  • Culprits
  • Culprits Egypt
  • Culprits Israel
  • Culprits Saudi Arabia
  • Culprits UAE
  • DAWN
  • DAWN Foreign Policy Blueprint
  • Dawn's Advocacy
  • Democracy In Exile
  • Editor's Pick
  • Egypt
  • Feature
  • Fellows
  • Foreign Policy
  • Human Rights
  • Human Rights Go to War
  • International Actors
  • Israel-Palestine
  • Joint Letters
  • Jordan
  • Lobbyists
  • Lobbyists Israel Palestine
  • Palestine
  • Political prisoners
  • Press Release Egypt
  • Press Release Israel-Palestine
  • Press Release Jordan
  • Press Release Saudi Arabia
  • Press Release UAE
  • Press Releases
  • Saudi Arabia
  • UAE
  • Uncategorized
  • United Nations
  • US – Egypt
  • US – Saudi Arabia
  • US – UAE
  • USA
  • Yemen Conference

SUPPORT OUR MISSION

Donate Today

Help DAWN protect the lives and rights of Palestinians in Gaza.

We’re fighting for a ceasefire and accountability for Israeli and U.S. officials responsible for war crimes in Gaza.

DONATE NOW

About Us

Democracy for the Arab World Now (DAWN) is a nonprofit organization that promotes democracy, the rule of law, and human rights for all of the peoples of the Middle East and North Africa (MENA).

Support Us

Donate Now

Newsletter

Facebook Icon-twitter-x Instagram Linkedin Youtube

© DAWN All rights reserved. | Website Design by KRS Creative.

Help DAWN protect the lives and rights of Palestinians in Gaza.

We’re fighting for a ceasefire and accountability for Israeli and U.S. officials responsible for war crimes in Gaza.
DONATE NOW