Help promote human rights in the Middle East and North Africa

Donate Today
Facebook-f Icon-twitter-x Instagram Linkedin Youtube Envelope
Search
Close this search box.
  • English
  • العربية
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • What We Do
    • Who We Are
    • FAQs
    • Support Dawn
    • Work With Us
    • For the Media
  • Founder Jamal Khashoggi
    • Who Was Jamal Khashoggi?
    • Chronology of a Murder
    • UN Recommendations
    • International Reaction
    • In His Own Words
    • DAWN and Jamal
  • Countries
    • USA
    • Saudi Arabia
    • Egypt
    • UAE
    • Israel-Palestine
    • Jordan
    • DAWN's Culprits Gallery
  • Democracy In Exile
    • About
    • Submission Guidelines for Democracy in Exile
  • Advocacy
    • The Lobbyist Hall of Shame
    • DAWN's Culprits Gallery
    • Reforming Foreign Policy
      • Aid Conditionality
      • Human Rights Go to War
      • China's Uyghur Repression
      • Yemen: Toward Sustainable Peace and Democracy
      • Bridging Restraint and Positive Engagement
    • US Foreign Policy in MENA
    • Joint Advocacy
    • DAWN Foreign Policy Blueprint
  • Experts
  • Latest
Menu
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • What We Do
    • Who We Are
    • FAQs
    • Support Dawn
    • Work With Us
    • For the Media
  • Founder Jamal Khashoggi
    • Who Was Jamal Khashoggi?
    • Chronology of a Murder
    • UN Recommendations
    • International Reaction
    • In His Own Words
    • DAWN and Jamal
  • Countries
    • USA
    • Saudi Arabia
    • Egypt
    • UAE
    • Israel-Palestine
    • Jordan
    • DAWN's Culprits Gallery
  • Democracy In Exile
    • About
    • Submission Guidelines for Democracy in Exile
  • Advocacy
    • The Lobbyist Hall of Shame
    • DAWN's Culprits Gallery
    • Reforming Foreign Policy
      • Aid Conditionality
      • Human Rights Go to War
      • China's Uyghur Repression
      • Yemen: Toward Sustainable Peace and Democracy
      • Bridging Restraint and Positive Engagement
    • US Foreign Policy in MENA
    • Joint Advocacy
    • DAWN Foreign Policy Blueprint
  • Experts
  • Latest
Donate

Iran's Orwellian Ploy to Outlaw Citizen Journalism and Online Speech

February 16, 2023
in Democracy In Exile
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Author

  • Kourosh Ziabari
    Kourosh Ziabari

    Kourosh Ziabari is an award-winning journalist from Iran and a correspondent for Asia Times. He is a 2022 World Press Institute fellow and a 2022 Dag Hammarskjold Fund for Journalists fellow at the United Nations. He contributes to Foreign Policy, The National Interest and Al-Monitor, among other publications.

    View all posts

Spooked by the success of citizen journalists in revealing the magnitude of the state-sponsored crackdown on protests and the critical role of popular public figures in mobilizing grassroots activists, Iran's parliament is pursuing two pieces of legislation that boil down to a government fiat that Iranians shouldn't have public opinions and express them freely.

As part of the first legislation, which is being euphemistically promoted as a "bill to criminalize the publication of news contradicting citizenship rights," the judicial commission of Iran's Majlis, or parliament, is working to codify into law a ban on publishing—both by individuals and media outlets—any news that may have "detrimental societal consequences."

According to hard-line Iranian MP Mohammad-Taghi Naghdali, anyone who publishes "mendacious reports" on social media should be held accountable—and they will be punished if they cannot compensate for the so-called negative impacts of what they publish. He added that the "exaggeration of news" also falls within the ambit of the bill's punitive measures.

Kazem Delkhosh, another hard-line MP who backs the bill, said anyone in Iran who publishes "inaccurate news" online or promotes it should appear before a judge. There would be no distinction, he warned, between "individuals or media" in how the law would be enforced.

Iran's parliament is pursuing two pieces of legislation that boil down to a government fiat that Iranians shouldn't have public opinions and express them freely.

- Kourosh Ziabari

This is still a tentative proposal and requires the final endorsement of the majority of the 290 lawmakers in the Majlis and then a seal of approval by the powerful Guardian Council. But given the composition of both bodies, dominated by hard-liners and fervent supporters of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, it isn't far-fetched for it to become law soon. It is only the latest sign of how Iran's parliament is not seeking to address the pressing issues that matter to most Iranians or respond to the public outcry in the streets since September. Instead, this reactionary legislation is essentially trying to outlaw citizen journalism, after ordinary Iranians played an indispensable role documenting the atrocities by police and security forces on the streets of Iran since September.

The second piece of proposed legislation seeks to criminalize statements by high-profile public figures on social media, with up to 15 years in prison for people of "social, political, family, scientific, cultural and military" stature who attempt to express opinions "inconsistent with the reality" in Iran as stated by the authorities. The bill, however farcical and Orwellian it may seem, essentially means that the Iranian people should parrot the government's line in any opinion they share publicly about matters of national or international importance.

The law is tantamount to engineering public opinion—to eliminate any freedom of expression online and suppress the intellectual diversity of Iranian society. It is no doubt a reaction to the astonishing role that Iranian celebrities have played during the "Woman, Life, Freedom" protests, contesting official state narratives and expressing sympathy and solidarity with demonstrators—which clearly caused the leadership of the Islamic Republic much discomfort. Many of these celebrities have also been targeted and punished by the regime for speaking out. Parliament wants to formalize that crackdown in law, so that actors, athletes, artists and other celebrities cannot question the regime or present ideas on social media that the theocracy deems disobedient or irksome.

Iran's media laws are already strict enough. Under existing laws, independent media are jockeying for survival, the government has carte blanche to take a myriad of arbitrary measures to stifle critical journalists, and any view that belies the government-mandated version of events can risk legal charges, imprisonment and worse.

In December, Reporters Without Borders named Iran as the third-worst jailer of journalists after China and Myanmar; at least 47 journalists remain behind bars in Iran. According to the Committee to Protect Journalists, 95 journalists have been arrested since the beginning of the protests on Sept. 16, 2022, when 22-year-old Mahsa Amini died in the custody of the so-called morality police. Those journalists facing the most serious charges are the ones who first broke the story of her death. The Iranian government blamed the media for fomenting unrest, rather than finding fault with its own morality police or its objectionable policies against women, including the reviled hijab law.

"Different types of governments at least attempt to shape and control master narratives that affect their legitimacy and power," said Pantea Javidan, a research fellow at Stanford University's Center for Human Rights and International Justice. "The more authoritarian and insecure the regime or administration, the more threatened by a free press and authentic reporting, since media is capable of exposing their lack of sufficient support and disapproval among citizens, which is necessary for human rights, democratic governance, justice and accountability."

"The more authoritarian and insecure the regime or administration, the more threatened by a free press and authentic reporting."

- Pantea Javidan, research fellow at Stanford University's Center for Human Rights and International Justice

Iranian authorities and pro-regime pundits like to bluster about Iran being a free and democratic country, where everyone is allowed to have different views and express them without facing intimidation—especially when compared to other authoritarian governments in the Middle East. They often claim that Iran's constitution has recognized these fundamental rights and entitled the media and civil society to challenge the government. But in practice, these boasts ring hollow given the government's track record. In Reporters Without Borders' World Press Freedom Index 2022, Iran is ranked 178 out of 180 countries surveyed, only above Eritrea and North Korea. "Journalists and independent media in Iran are constantly persecuted by means of arbitrary arrests and very heavy sentences handed down after grossly unfair trials before revolutionary courts," Reporters Without Borders noted.

For a political and religious establishment obsessed with ensuring that every Iranian thinks and behaves according to its terms, these bills, if passed, could be a vehicle for increased surveillance and silencing of public opinion, even if there would be questions about how the laws would actually be enforced. Courts would be overwhelmed going after every single artist, athlete or academic for publishing a critical viewpoint on social media, and the authorities cannot take away every Iranian's smartphone.

"As the wording of the law is quite broad and can easily refer to any post on social media about Iranian politics, there are valid fears that the revolutionary courts can easily establish grounds for a simple tweet to be punished as a criminal act," said Sahar Maranlou, a lecturer at Essex Law School in the United Kingdom. "The authorities should understand that journalism is not a crime, and such a bill will only result in violating the rights of people to information guaranteed by Iran's 2009 Publication and Free Access to Information Act."

Browbeating a population of 85 million into silence and passing laws that criminalize the expression of differing views are signs of a regime in deep decline that fears it has lost its legitimacy from the public. History shows that such gambits often backfire.

Iranian President Ibrahim Raisi addresses parliament in Tehran, Jan. 22, 2023. (Photo by ATTA KENARE/AFP via Getty Images)

Source: Getty IMages

Tags: Iran
Previous Post

Bahrain's Government Cannot Bury the Legacy of the 2011 Uprising

Next Post

State Department Withdrawal of Nomination Due to Criticism of Israel Undermines Free Expression and Human Rights Work

Related Posts

Democracy In Exile

Biden Should Heed the State Department's Dissent Over Gaza

What Syria and Gaza have in common is armed conflict whose destruction has fallen disproportionately on civilians.

Frederic C. Hof
November 30, 2023
Bridging Restraint

How a Foreign Policy of 'Restraint-Plus' Can Advance Human Rights

Debates over what restraint means for broader values-based commitments in U.S. foreign policy often hinge on one question: If...

Aslı Bâli
November 28, 2023
Democracy In Exile

The Gendered Nature of Authoritarianism

When authoritarian regimes are confronted with public protest and social unrest, they often respond by violently attacking women.

Dalia Fahmy
November 22, 2023
Democracy In Exile

After This War, Peacemaking Between Israelis and Palestinians Must Move Beyond Oslo

The international community would be wise to shed its two-state blinders and start considering alternatives to the Oslo-era process.

Michael Omer-Man
November 17, 2023
Next Post
@JimCavallaro

State Department Withdrawal of Nomination Due to Criticism of Israel Undermines Free Expression and Human Rights Work

Biden Should Heed the State Department's Dissent Over Gaza

November 30, 2023

How a Foreign Policy of 'Restraint-Plus' Can Advance Human Rights

November 28, 2023
GAZA CITY, GAZA - NOVEMBER 19: Palestinians in central and northern parts of the Gaza migrate to the southern parts of Gaza, passing through Israeli soldiers and tanks as the Israeli attacks continue in Gaza City, Gaza on November 19, 2023. (Photo by Mustafa Hassona/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Qatar, Egypt, and USA Urged to Halt Forced Displacement and Prevent Mass Deportation from Gaza

November 28, 2023

Categories

  • Advocacy
  • Aid Conditionality
  • Anonymous Interviews
  • Anonymous Interviews Egypt
  • Anonymous Interviews Saudi Arabia
  • Anonymous Interviews UAE
  • Bridging Restraint
  • Cases
  • Cases Egypt
  • Cases Saudi Arabia
  • Cases UAE
  • China's Uyghur Repression
  • Countries
  • Culprits
  • Culprits Egypt
  • Culprits Israel
  • Culprits Saudi Arabia
  • Culprits UAE
  • DAWN
  • DAWN Foreign Policy Blueprint
  • Dawn's Advocacy
  • Democracy In Exile
  • Editor's Pick
  • Egypt
  • Feature
  • Fellows
  • Foreign Policy
  • Human Rights
  • Human Rights Go to War
  • International Actors
  • Israel-Palestine
  • Joint Letters
  • Jordan
  • Lobbyists
  • Lobbyists Israel Palestine
  • Palestine
  • Political prisoners
  • Press Release Egypt
  • Press Release Israel-Palestine
  • Press Release Jordan
  • Press Release Saudi Arabia
  • Press Release UAE
  • Press Releases
  • Saudi Arabia
  • UAE
  • Uncategorized
  • United Nations
  • US – Egypt
  • US – Saudi Arabia
  • US – UAE
  • USA
  • Yemen Conference

SUPPORT OUR MISSION

Donate Today

Help DAWN protect the lives and rights of Palestinians in Gaza.

We’re fighting for a ceasefire and accountability for Israeli and U.S. officials responsible for war crimes in Gaza.

DONATE NOW

About Us

Democracy for the Arab World Now (DAWN) is a nonprofit organization that promotes democracy, the rule of law, and human rights for all of the peoples of the Middle East and North Africa (MENA).

Support Us

Donate Now

Newsletter

Facebook Icon-twitter-x Instagram Linkedin Youtube

© DAWN All rights reserved. | Website Design by KRS Creative.

Help DAWN protect the lives and rights of Palestinians in Gaza.

We’re fighting for a ceasefire and accountability for Israeli and U.S. officials responsible for war crimes in Gaza.
DONATE NOW